<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT? - Gizmodo Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:34:16 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:34:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c1197086]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
They can always remake Knight Rider, Airwolf, Blue Thunder, but if they go too far from what the fans of the series remember, they could tank the whole concept.  Battlestar Galactica wasn't actually as much a remake as a reimagining of the story, which is different.  I'd hate for them to do to Knight Rider what they did to Dukes of Hazard and Beverly Hillbillies.  It just wouldn't be Knight Rider anymore.  It'd be something else using the series ID I remember.  Which would suck.</p> <p>hawkesrun1961</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[hawkesrun1961]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c1197086]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:34:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c747977]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
NO NO NO!!!IT'S GOT TO BE THE ORIGINAL TRANS AM . REDO THE INSIDE WITH INDIGLOW LCD AND THE WORK'S  KEEP THE RIMS AND CAPS . CRAZY ANIMATION ETC.....</p> <p>TXKNIGHTRIDER82</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TXKNIGHTRIDER82]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c747977]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:22:16 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c737978]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I agree with cool up to a extent. The new Transam just doesn't measure up to me. I think the best cars to use would be the new Solstice or the new GTO. </p> <p>fureousfureous</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[fureousfureous]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c737978]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:11:49 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c687129]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
The new k.i.t.t is a joke,It has to be a 2000 - 06 trans-am or a banshee from the knight rider<br />
t.v movie. Don't mess up the series knight rider by changeing the car.</p> <p>cool</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cool]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c687129]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:59:48 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c419436]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
nah</p>
<p>
they need the hoff to make it a winner.</p>
<p>
car looks good though, but i'd like it more like the original</p>
<p>
<br />
<a href="http://www.red91.com">http://www.red91.com</a></p> <p>indiehead</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[indiehead]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c419436]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:33:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c410757]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
WHAT TYPE OF A MAN SHOULD BE MOST ASKING QUESTION ANSWER IS BRAVE HAERT NOT A MOVIE NAME  BUT SHOULD BE HONEST IN HIS WORKS</p> <p>WQAS_ZAHID</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[WQAS_ZAHID]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c410757]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 09 Sep 2006 13:32:21 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c410756]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
DONT BE AFRAID IAM WITH U</p> <p>WQAS_ZAHID</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[WQAS_ZAHID]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c410756]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 09 Sep 2006 13:29:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c406144]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Bandit, what world were you living in back in the 80's? Are you kidding me? That Trans-Am was very popular and was not considered an "everyday car". And how stealthy is a red revolving laser beam at the front of your car, anyway?</p>
<p>
That being said, I LOVE the look of this version! As for the role of M. Knight: George Clooney. He's got the chin, the grin and the "Mr. Hollywood" look.</p> <p>RiceBandit</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RiceBandit]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c406144]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:30:52 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c405170]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Jason-<br />
Takeshi works because he's got the hair</p> <p>thrillhouse</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[thrillhouse]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c405170]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:23:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c405016]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
So taking what bandit says, the new KITT should be a blue PT cruiser.</p> <p>Geisrud</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geisrud]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c405016]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 15:52:29 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c404751]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This is silly.  KITT must not only be fast, but also stealthy.  The TransAm worked because it wasn't such an unusual car at the time.  There's no way that Michael Knight does any sort of slinking around in this car without generating immediate unwanted attention.  Boo.</p> <p>bandit</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[bandit]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c404751]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:50:45 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c404731]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
It's fine just as long as it has "Pursuit mode", complete with aerodynamic transformation and twin rocket boosters. </p> <p>wohho</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[wohho]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c404731]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:44:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c404592]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This is one instance where they're taking something from my childhood and changing it and I don't feel like complaining.  As much as I love the original KITT, this is a very worthy replacement.</p> <p>scorpicon</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[scorpicon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c404592]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:15:55 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c404517]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I reckon Ryan Seacrest has the perfect amount of 'cheese factor' to be the next Hoff.</p> <p><a href="http://www.nzruss.blogspot.com">nzruss</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[nzruss]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c404517]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:58:32 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c404384]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Boy, I hope this'll be as good as the Dukes of Hazard remake. Or maybe as good as the Knight Rider 2000 made-for-TV movie.</p> <p><a href="http://www.300poundmusic.com">AmishPhysicist</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[AmishPhysicist]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c404384]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:30:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c404260]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Takeshi's way better anyway. But Koenigs isn't Japanese.</p> <p><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com">Jason Chen</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c404260]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:02:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The New Knight Rider KITT?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-new-knight-rider-kitt-199126.php#c404178]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I think this only works if you replace "the Hoff" with Takeshi Kaneshiro</p> <p>thrillhouse</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[thrillhouse]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4:199126:c404178]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:45:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>